πŸŽ“ Get 25% Off Premium Certification Materials - Use Coupon Code: PASS25
Home Exams
CRISC ISACA CISSP ISC2 200-301 Cisco SY0-701 CompTIA AZ-104 Microsoft AI-900 Microsoft AIGP IAPP 1Z0-1067-26 Oracle View All Exams →
About Us FAQs
Sign In Register Free

ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions

Preparing for the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam is simple with ExamsDay. We offer easy-to-understand study materials that help you learn the most important exam topics. You can study using our PDF questions, practice online with a real exam-style test, or use the desktop practice software. Choose the study method that works best for you and prepare at your own pace.

At ExamsDay, we keep our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice questions up to date. Whenever the exam syllabus or objectives change, we update our study materials so you always learn the latest topics. This helps you save time, avoid outdated content, and feel more confident when you take your exam.

Download Exam View Entire Exam
Page: 3 / 3
Question #11 (Topic: Demo Questions)

The IT Department of a financial institution decided to implement preventive controls to avoid potential security breaches. Therefore, they separated the development, testing, and operating equipment, secured their offices, and used cryptographic keys. However, they are seeking further measures to enhance their security and minimize the risk of security breaches. Which of the following controls would help the IT Department achieve this objective?

A.

Alarms to detect risks related to heat, smoke, fire, or water

B.

Change all passwords of all systems

C.

An access control software to restrict access to sensitive files

Correct Answer: C
Explanation:

An access control software is a type of preventive control that is designed to limit the access to sensitive files and information based on the user’s identity, role, or authorization level. An access control software helps to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information by preventing unauthorized users from viewing, modifying, or deleting it. An access control software also helps to create an audit trail that records who accessed what information and when, which can be useful for accountability and compliance purposes.

The IT Department of a financial institution decided to implement preventive controls to avoid potential security breaches. Therefore, they separated the development, testing, and operating equipment, secured their offices, and used cryptographic keys. However, they are seeking further measures to enhance their security and minimize the risk of security breaches. An access control software would help the IT Department achieve this objective by adding another layer of protection to their sensitive files and information, and ensuring that only authorized personnel can access them.

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Course Guide1

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Info Kit2

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management Systems - Requirements3

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Code of Practice for Information Security Controls4

What are Information Security Controls? - SecurityScorecard4

What Are the Types of Information Security Controls? - RiskOptics2

Integrity is the property of safeguarding the accuracy and completeness of information and processing methods. A breach of integrity occurs when information is modified or destroyed in an unauthorized or unintended manner. In this case, Diana accidently modified the order details of a customer without their permission, which resulted in the customer receiving an incorrect product. This means that the information about the customer’s order was not accurate or complete, and therefore, the integrity principle was breached. Availability and confidentiality are two other information security principles, but they were not violated in this case. Availability is the property of being accessible and usable upon demand by an authorized entity, and confidentiality is the property of preventing disclosure of information to unauthorized individuals or systems.

[References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer Course Content, Module 5: Introduction to Information Security Controls based on ISO/IEC 27001:20221; ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security, Cybersecurity and Privacy Protection, Clause 3.7: Integrity2, , , ]
Question #12 (Topic: Demo Questions)

Scenario 10: CircuitLinking is a company specializing in water purification solutions, designing and manufacturing efficient filtration and treatment systems for both residential and commercial applications. Over the past two years, the company has actively implemented an integrated management system (IMS) that aligns with both ISO/IEC 27001 for information security and ISO 9001 for quality management. Recently, the company has taken a significant step forward by applying for a combined audit, aiming to achieve certification against both ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.

In preparation for the certification audit, CircuitLinking ensured a clear understanding of ISO/IEC 27001 within the company and identified key subject-matter experts to assist the auditors. It also allocated sufficient resources and performed a self-assessment to verify that processes were clearly defined, roles and responsibilities were segregated, and documented information was maintained. To avoid delays, the company gathered all necessary documentation in advance to provide evidence that procedures were in place and effective.

Following the successful completion of the Stage 1 audit, which focused on verifying the design of the management system, the Stage 2 audit was conducted to examine the implementation and effectiveness of the information security and quality management systems.

One of the auditors, Megan, was a previous employee of the company. To uphold the integrity of the certification process, the company notified the certification body about the potential conflict of interest and requested an auditor change. Subsequently, the certification body selected a replacement, ensuring impartiality. Additionally, the company requested a background check of the audit team members; however, the certification body denied this request. The necessary adjustments to the audit plan were made, and transparent communication with stakeholders was maintained.

The audit process continued seamlessly under the new auditor’s guidance. Upon audit completion, the certification body evaluated the results and conclusions of the audit and CircuitLinking ' s public information and awarded CircuitLinking the combined certification.

A recertification audit for CircuitLinking was conducted to verify that the company ' s management system continued to meet the required standards and remained effective within the defined scope of certification. CircuitLinking had implemented significant changes to its management system, including a major overhaul of its information security processes, the adoption of new technology platforms, and adjustments to comply with recent changes in industry legislation. Due to these substantial updates, the recertification audit required a Stage 1 assessment to evaluate the impact of these changes.

According to Scenario 10, is the request made by CircuitLinking to replace Megan acceptable?

A.

Yes, but no other auditor should have been assigned in her place

B.

No, as long as she remains impartial, she can audit CircuitLinking

C.

Yes, considering her past as an employee for CircuitLinking

D.

No, only the same auditor can complete the full audit cycle

Correct Answer: C
Explanation:

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 (the international standard for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems), impartiality is a foundational requirement for the credibility and trustworthiness of the audit and certification process. The standard specifies that audit teams must be free from conflicts of interest, including recent employment with the auditee, which could impair actual or perceived impartiality.

Relevant Extract:

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 5.2.7:

β€œThe certification body shall require personnel, internal and external, to reveal any situation known to them that may present them or the certification body with a conflict of interest. Certification bodies shall use this information as input to identifying and resolving conflicts of interest.”

ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clause 9.2.2.3:

β€œThe certification body shall ensure that, where an auditor has provided management system consultancy, including being employed by the client organization, there is a minimum period of two years before that auditor can participate in an audit or other certification activities of that client.”

Even if Megan can remain impartial, her previous employment at CircuitLinking can create a perception of bias or a conflict of interest, and ISO best practices are to replace such an auditor to ensure impartiality. CircuitLinking ' s request for replacement is both reasonable and encouraged under ISO/IEC 17021-1.

[References:, , ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, Clauses 5.2.7 and 9.2.2.3, , ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Implementation Guidance, Auditor Impartiality and Conflict of Interest, , Summary:, A client’s request to replace an auditor with a potential conflict of interestβ€”such as a previous employment relationshipβ€”is not only acceptable but also aligned with international best practices for impartiality and objectivity in the certification process., , Correct Answer:, C. Yes, considering her past as an employee for CircuitLinking, , , ]
Download Exam
« Prev Page: 3 / 3
Next Page